|
Alternative scenarios
assess possibility of wrong productivity growth estimates.
In two key alternative scenarios, the IMF accounts for the possibility
that private sector assessments of the underlying productivity growth in
the United States may have been skewed. The argument goes that if the
past long-term productivity trend is overestimated; a significant drop in
activity will follow, once the inaccuracy is realized, to correct for the
excesses in technology spending associated with earlier exuberance. The
first scenario assumes that future U.S. total factor productivity growth
is actually half a percentage point higher than in the baseline scenario.
As a result, the improvement in future expectations of profits and wages
will raise investment and consumption. The increase in domestic demand
and output, are accompanied by steady upward pressure on the US$ and the
stock market, which will be only partly offset by tighter monetary policy
to address the emergence of inflationary pressures. The second IMF
scenario assumes that since 1996 the underlying U.S. total factor
productivity has actually been growing at 0.25 percentage points lower
than in the WEO baseline economic forecast and that productivity growth
from 2002 onwards will be 0.5 percentage points lower than in the baseline
forecast for the rest of the advanced economies. The resulting overhang
in investment. will prompt firms to adjust to the desired capital output
ratio, which would trigger a steep drop in domestic demand and associated
declines in equity markets and the value of the US$. In the Euro Area,
real
domestic demand would rise above the baseline scenario, since the exchange
rate appreciation and lower inflation would enable monetary authorities to
lower short-term interest rates, thus boosting investment and consumption.
In Japan, on the other hand domestic demand would drop, since monetary
authorities lack additional room for monetary easing. In developing
countries, domestic demand would drop off owing to net lower demand in the
advanced economies.
Table 3: Alternative
Scenarios
|
|
Scenario 1 |
Scenario 2 |
|
|
Faster U.S. Productivity Growth |
Immediate Realization of Slower Productivity Growth |
|
|
2002 |
2003 |
2004 |
2005 |
2002 |
2003 |
2004 |
2005 |
|
World |
0.3 |
0.5 |
0.7 |
0.9 |
-1.2 |
-1.6 |
-1.8 |
-2.1 |
|
United States |
0.8 |
1.1 |
1.8 |
2.4 |
-2.2 |
-2.7 |
-2.8 |
-2.8 |
|
Japan |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.3 |
-1.0 |
-1.5 |
-1.8 |
-1.9 |
|
Euro Area |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.3 |
-1.0 |
-1.4 |
-1.8 |
-2.4 |
|
Developing Countries |
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.3 |
0.4 |
-0.5 |
-0.7 |
-1.0 |
-1.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note: Real GDP, percent deviation from baseline scenario. |
|
|
|
Continue
>>
Note:
The above text is an abridged version of the LatinFocus Consensus Forecast
briefing for Latin America. For
more details please click here.
For five-year forecasts,
please click here.
|